data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ca4d2/ca4d2c7e965bcfe167714bcf51492807f663a7d5" alt=""
Last week, SFCritic made a post concerning
the continuing debate between dancehall performer, Buju Banton and the LGTBQ community that is protesting his music. The debate concerns the LGBTQ's proposed boycott of Buju Banton's performances in the US as a result of a statements, and particularly a song Banton made in the past, which has lyrics describing how to kill gay people.
After posting this article, SFCritic received a reply from a reader named "Optimistic Spirit." Through a detailed correspondence, SFCritic and Optimistic Spirit, debated the issues concerning the boycott, Buju Banton and the freedom of speech. Below, I've highlighted some of the points that Optimistic Spirit has made; also, if you're interested in reading more, follow the links at the bottom to see all of the full replies between SFCritic and Optimistic Spirit.
This is a very serious issue with its implication for the freedom of speech of artists, as well as the issues of violence against members of the LGTBQ community. I encourage you to read these messages, and add your own comments at the end of the article.
Some of Optimistic Spirit's Points:1. in addition, such mistruths, halftruths, and an overall climate of censorship and outright lies by gay activists has resulted in controversy without clarity, and has not moved the discussion forward.
2. both sites you link to contain numerous inaccuracies--the biggest probably being Peter Tatchell saying "this is not a free speech issue," which directly contradicts the opinion of the Florida ACLU.
3. look, gay rights in Jamaica is an important issue. But Buju Banton is not a head of state. the government's official position is that laws banning gay sex will not be lifted.
4. In other words, the First Amendment cannot be used selectively. The repercussions of censoring Banton by cancelling his shows might actually be that they could have a chilling effect on free speech overall, which might actually limit the rights of LGBT groups to express themselves freely, such as by holding peaceful protests. That's why it's a slippery slope.
5. i also find your characterization of Buju's music as "homophobic" misleading at best. regardless of his ideological beliefs, it's a fact that he has recorded exactly one homophobic song, 21 years ago.
6. In 2005, the gay lobby said they would lift the boycott if he stopped advocating killing gay people and committed to making "positive music." yet they have not only reneged on this, but have in effect, insisted he reject his Rastafarian ideology and embrace gayness. That is the imposition of moral standards, and is something which is not only troubling, but hard to justify legally--that's called fascism.
To read SFCritic's responses and Optimistic Spirit's elongated message, click below: